Runtime Security

Protect mobile apps against Increasing Runtime Attacks

Once deployed, mobile applications run on devices you don't control. Attackers can use hooking frameworks, debuggers, code injection, rooted or jailbroken environments, emulators, and runtime manipulation techniques to interfere with how an application behaves.

What Are Runtime Attacks?

Runtime attacks target a mobile application while it is actively executing. Instead of only exploiting weaknesses in source code or modifying an APK/IPA before launch, attackers can manipulate the running application, its memory, execution flow, or device environment.

Runtime code manipulation techniques such as in-memory patching, code injection, injected libraries, and function hooking. These techniques can allow attackers to change application behaviour even when the original app package is correctly signed.

This makes runtime security fundamentally different from pre-release security testing: the threat exists inside the live application environment.

ACTIVELY EXECUTINGlive_app_environmentmemorydevice_envIN-MEMORYRuntime Security ActiveSIGNEDHOOKINGCode InjectionAPP INTACTCorrectly Signed

The Mobile Attack Surface Is Getting Harder to Trust

Device & OS TierBinary Protection TierApp & Sideload Tier

94,000+ Malicious Apps Found

94,000+ malicious apps were detected on enterprise devices in Q1 2025.

43% of Android Devices Contain Sideloading Apps

43% of Android devices in Asia-Pacific (APAC) have sideloading applications (apps downloaded from third party sources outside of Google Play Store), making the issue particularly relevant for mobile-first markets such as India.

200% Higher Malware Exposure

Users who sideload applications were 200% more likely to have malware running on their devices than users who did not sideload apps.

60%+ of iOS Apps Lack Basic Code Protection

More than 60% of iOS apps and up to 34% of Android apps lacked basic code protection, leaving many applications with limited resilience against analysis and manipulation.

Runtime Attacks Can Become Business Risk

A successful runtime compromise can affect the trust organisations place in the application.

For CISOs, CTOs, Heads of Information Security, AppSec, DevSecOps, developers, and fraud teams, this creates a fundamental question:

Can you trust the application only because it was securely released—or can you verify that trust while it is running?

Security Must Continue After the App Is Released

A layered approach to runtime hooking that combines preventive controls such as root detection and device/app attestation; detective controls such as runtime integrity and hooking detection; and responsive controls when manipulation is detected.

For sensitive applications, runtime signals can also be combined with hardware-backed attestation and server-side security verification. Android, for example, supports hardware-backed key attestation to provide stronger evidence that cryptographic keys are stored within supported secure hardware.

No single signal should determine trust.

PREVENTDETECTRESPONDHARDWAREHardware Key AttestServer Verification

What Bugsmirror MASST Delivers?

Runtime Threat Detection

Detects runtime threats including root/jailbreak, Frida, Magisk/Zygisk, Xposed/LSPosed, hooking, code injection, debugging, emulator environments, repackaging and application tampering.

Server-Side Trust Validation

Extend runtime trust beyond decisions made inside the application. Trust API Bind enables backend systems to validate runtime security signals before trusting sensitive API requests.

Active Runtime Response

Go beyond detection with configurable mitigation policies. Depending on the threat and security policy, applications can warn users, terminate execution, log detections or allow defined exceptions.

Real-Time Threat Visibility

Understand what is happening across applications, users and devices with ThreatLens. Security teams can investigate runtime events instead of waiting until suspicious activity becomes a larger incident.

Secure Your App Today

Empowering leading enterprises to protect their digital assets with next-generation security.

4.9/5★★★★★Gartner Peer Insights
100M+Users Protected
100+Apps Secured
1000+Apps Hardned
Protecting teams at:
Centpays
Centpays
Goi
Goi
Google
Google
Meta
Meta
Iprogrammer
Iprogrammer
Crunchfish
Crunchfish
Lxme
Lxme
MinistryofHM
MinistryofHM
Neogrowth
Neogrowth
Niyo
Niyo
Npci
Npci
Onemoney
Onemoney
Samsung
Samsung
Scripbox
Scripbox
Tecno
Tecno
Vi
Vi
Bharatpe
Bharatpe
Navi
Navi
Sodel
Sodel
Centpays
Centpays
Goi
Goi
Google
Google
Meta
Meta
Iprogrammer
Iprogrammer
Crunchfish
Crunchfish
Lxme
Lxme
MinistryofHM
MinistryofHM
Neogrowth
Neogrowth
Niyo
Niyo
Npci
Npci
Onemoney
Onemoney
Samsung
Samsung
Scripbox
Scripbox
Tecno
Tecno
Vi
Vi
Bharatpe
Bharatpe
Navi
Navi
Sodel
Sodel

Let's Talk Security

Fill out the form below and our security experts will reach out to you shortly.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAQs

FAQ Graphic
Blogs

Explore related content

Learn about mobile app protection, runtime security, RASP, and app shielding.

9 Mistakes To Avoid While Choosing RASP Security for Fintech Apps
Bugsmirror Defender
🕐 7 min read

9 Mistakes To Avoid While Choosing RASP Security for Fintech Apps

Choosing the wrong RASP can expose fintech apps to fraud, API abuse, and compliance risks. Discover the most common mistakes and how solutions like Bugsmirror MASST, Defender, and TAB help secure mobile transactions effectively.

How to Strengthen Application-Layer Security to Prevent UPI Frauds
Security Blogs
🕐 6 min read

How to Strengthen Application-Layer Security to Prevent UPI Frauds

UPI fraud is increasingly influenced by threats originating on the mobile device and inside the application environment. Explore how Bugsmirror MASST strengthens UPI-enabled applications through runtime protection, app integrity, shielding, secure API communication, and continuous threat visibility.